<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="0.91" >
<channel>
<title>Mersey Internet</title>
<link>http://www.merseyinternet.com/serendipity/</link>
<description>Web Design and Development for Liverpool Businesses</description>
<language>en</language>


<item>
    <title>Rank Decoding Engine - An Initial Review</title>
    <link>http://www.merseyinternet.com/serendipity/archives/Rank-Decoding-Engine-An-Initial-Review.html</link>

    <description>
        Have you tried Michelle MacPhearson&#039;s Rank Decoding Engine from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crowdmountainsite.com&quot; title=&quot;Crown Mountain Site&quot;&gt;http://www.crowdmountainsite.com&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s a great piece of free software that will help you find out which sites Google rates most highly in your particular niche.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unusually for such a great and useful program, it is actually possible to do what it does, yourself, manually. So I had a go, the hard way to see what I found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To make my life simpler I just chose a single keyword phrase (in reality you would choose nearer 10 phrases)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On my test the top Crowd Mountain results were:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
site1.com 3 results&lt;br /&gt;
site2.com 2 results&lt;br /&gt;
etc&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and on my manual test I was able to check site1.com and see its 3 results were in positions 17, 37 and 39 &lt;br /&gt;
and site2.com was in positions 6 and 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So remember - the Rank Decoding Engine simply orders sites by the number of times they appear in the top 50 search results. It doesn&#039;t weight the sites by position.&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m just wondering which site you would say had the most authority. The one that appears 3 times in the top 50 but at low positions (17, 37 and 39) or the one that appears twice at higher positions (6 and 8)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What if a site came in at positions 1 and 2. The Rank Decoding Engine would rate it lower than a site that came in at 48, 49 and 50. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just something to think about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BUG ALERT &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I have found a bug as well although I really need to test this a bit more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
site1.com was actually uk.com and The Rank Decoding Engine reported it as having 3 results in my test.&lt;br /&gt;
But when I looked the sites were actually&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
www.feathers.uk.com&lt;br /&gt;
www.historic-uk.com&lt;br /&gt;
www.hotels.uk.com&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so historic-uk.com shouldn&#039;t have been counted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a uk resident I&#039;m looking forward to country specific versions but I&#039;m more than happy with what we have at the moment. A really useful tool to add to the list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mike Kay&lt;br /&gt;
Mersey Internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 
    </description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
